Grilla Original vs Silverbac: Size Is Not the Whole Story
Openly: affiliate links sit here and we earn on either grill. The cheaper model wins two of the arguments below outright, including the one about accuracy, and we have left that standing.
Same company. Same warranty. Same temperature range. Two completely different shapes.
Most people treat this as a simple size and budget decision, where the small one is for small gardens and the big one is for everyone else. Run the numbers and Grilla Original vs Silverbac turns out to be a stranger comparison than that.
Two Shapes, One Brand
| Grilla OG Alpha Connect | Silverbac 2.0 | |
| Shape | Upright cylinder | Half barrel |
| Price | $799, listed from $1,499 | $1,099.99 |
| Main grate | 346 sq in | 507 sq in |
| Upper rack | 142 sq in | 185 sq in |
| Total | 488 sq in | 692 sq in |
| Hopper | 20 lb | 33 lb |
| Temperature | 180F to 500F | 180F to 500F |
| Weight | 145 lb | 170 lb |
| Width | 31.5 in | 48 in |
| Warranty | Four years | Four years |
Look at the shape row and the width row together. One of these is 16.5 inches narrower than the other.
The Grilla OG Alpha Connect is an upright cylinder with a swing lid, which is genuinely unusual in a category where almost every other cooker is a half barrel lying on its side over a cart. The Silverbac takes that conventional shape and simply goes bigger with it.
Everything else lines up. Both run 180F to 500F, both use double wall construction, both carry four years, and both arrive with an Alpha Connect controller. The differences are geometry and capacity.
The Per Square Inch Surprise
Here is the first thing that does not go the way you expect.
| Cost per square inch | Grilla OG | Silverbac 2.0 |
| On the main grate | $2.31 | $2.17 |
| On total area | $1.64 | $1.59 |
| Cheaper per square inch | No | Yes |
The cheaper grill is the more expensive one per square inch. Not by much, but the direction is the point.
On main grate the OG works out at $2.31 a square inch while the Silverbac comes in at $2.17, and on total area it is $1.64 against $1.59. So the bigger, dearer grill is fractionally better value by the measure most buyers assume favours the small one.
That happens because a pellet grill's cost is not mostly its cooking area. Controller, auger, fan, igniter, hopper and double walled body all cost roughly the same whether you wrap them around 488 square inches or 692, so the small model carries the same hardware over less grate.
One caveat that matters. The $799 figure is a discounted price against a $1,499 list, and at full list the OG would run $4.33 a square inch, which nobody should pay. The discount is doing all the work in this comparison.

What the Extra $301 Actually Buys
| What the extra $301 buys | Amount | Rate |
| Extra total area | 204 sq in | $1.48 a square inch |
| Extra main grate | 161 sq in | $1.87 a square inch |
| Extra hopper | 13 lb | About 13 more hours |
| Extra width you must find | 16.5 in | Costs you patio |
Two hundred and four extra square inches at $1.48 each, which is cheaper than either grill's average rate.
Read the top two rows and the upgrade looks sensible. Buying the extra area on its own costs less per square inch than either machine does overall, so if you want the space, the Silverbac is not overcharging you for it.
The hopper line is the underrated one. Thirty three pounds against twenty, at roughly a pound an hour while smoking, is about thirteen extra hours of unattended runtime, which is the difference between loading once for a brisket and setting an alarm to top it up.
The bottom row is the one people forget about until delivery day arrives. Sixteen and a half extra inches of width has to come from somewhere, and on a narrow deck or a townhouse patio that single measurement makes the whole decision for you before any of the cooking arguments matter.
Then the Temperature Result Arrives
This is where the comparison stops being about size at all.
- Smoked BBQ Source measured the OG holding within 5F
- AmazingRibs measured 15 to 20F variation across the Silverbac's corners
- Testers also found the Silverbac's 180F setting running near 260F until adjusted
- The OG's cylindrical chamber was credited with generous smoke output
Take those figures as published and the cheaper, smaller Grilla is the tighter cooker, by a factor of three or four, which is the opposite of what $301 is supposed to buy.
Being fair about it, those are different measurements taken by different reviewers on different days, and corner to corner spread across a chamber is not the same thing as swing over time at one probe. Treat the gap as a strong signal, not a laboratory verdict.
There is a plausible physical reason though. A tall narrow cylinder is a smaller volume with more even convection than a wide half barrel, where the ends sit further from the firepot than the middle does. Shape explains a lot here.
The Argument Nobody Makes
Thirty one and a half inches wide.
That is the OG, and it is narrower than most four burner gas grills, which puts a proper wood pellet smoker onto balconies and side returns where a Silverbac 2.0 simply will not fit. It weighs 25 pounds less too. And it arrives 99% assembled.
Against that, even the reviewers who liked it were clear about the ceiling. Four hundred and eighty eight square inches does not cook for a crowd, the side trays sit awkwardly, and anyone regularly feeding eight people is going to outgrow this grill inside a season.

So Which One
| Your situation | Buy |
| Tightest measured temperature | OG |
| Narrow patio or balcony | OG |
| Cooking for a crowd | Silverbac |
| Overnight cooks without refilling | Silverbac |
| Lowest price to get started | OG |
| Best cost per square inch | Silverbac, narrowly |
Three rows to the OG, three to the Silverbac, and the deciding one is simply how many people you cook for.
Buy the Grilla OG Alpha Connect if your space is tight, you cook for four or fewer, and you would rather have the grill that held within 5F in published testing than the one with more grate.
Buy the Silverbac 2.0 if you cook for a crowd, you want thirteen extra hours of hopper, and you have 48 inches of width to give it. The extra area is fairly priced and the shape is the one every accessory in the category is designed around.
Anyone weighing Grilla Original vs Silverbac on price alone is missing what the money does here, because $301 buys capacity rather than accuracy, and on this particular pairing those two things point in opposite directions.
FAQs
Which is bigger?
The Silverbac, at 692 square inches against 488. Its main grate is 46.5% larger.
Which holds temperature better?
The OG in published testing, measured within 5F against 15 to 20F variation on the Silverbac.
How much cheaper is the Original?
About $301 at current pricing, though that $799 is a discount against a $1,499 list.
Which fits a small patio?
The OG, easily. It is 31.5 inches wide against 48, so 16.5 inches narrower.
How long does each hopper last?
Roughly 20 hours and 33 hours at smoking temperatures, since both burn near a pound of pellets an hour.
Do they share a warranty?
Yes. Four years on both, with the same 180F to 500F range and the same Alpha Connect controller family.
Prices, specifications and warranty terms were accurate at the time of writing and change often, particularly on discounted listings. Temperature figures are drawn from published independent reviews rather than our own measurements, and were taken by different testers under different conditions. Confirm current pricing and which generation you are being offered before ordering.
Do you agree with our review?
Comments (0)
All comments are reviewed and approved by an admin before appearing publicly.
No comments yet - be the first to share your thoughts.
Ask a Question
Got a question about this review or the brand? Ask below - our team answers what we can, and it'll appear here for other readers too.



