Grilla vs Z Grills: Almost the Same Grill, $223 Apart
Openly: affiliate links sit here and we are paid on both of these brands. The measured result below still favours the cheaper one, and we have said so rather than splitting the difference.
Put these two side by side and something odd happens.
The cooking areas land within five square inches of each other. The main grates land within three. So Grilla vs Z Grills is not a size question at all, which leaves you staring at a $223 gap and wondering what it is for.
The Specs Are Uncannily Close
| Grilla Silverbac 2.0 | Z Grills 700D4E | |
| Price | $1,099.99 | $877.00 |
| Main grate | 507 sq in | 504 sq in |
| Upper rack | 185 sq in | 193 sq in |
| Total | 692 sq in | 697 sq in |
| Hopper | 33 lb | 28 lb |
| Temperature | 180F to 500F | 160F to 500F |
| Weight | 170 lb | 132 lb |
| Warranty | 4 years | 3 years |
Look at the total row. Six hundred ninety two against six hundred ninety seven, a difference of 0.7%, and the cheaper grill is the bigger one.
Both run WiFi controllers. Both use double wall construction. Both stop at 500F, and both are aimed at the same buyer, which is somebody who wants a real pellet cooker without paying Traeger money.
A note on that 500F figure. Z Grills publishes it, though one independent review lists the ceiling at 450F, so treat the top end as approximate on that model.
What the Extra $223 Actually Buys
Break the gap down and it stops being abstract.
| What the extra $223 buys | Amount | Cost of it |
| Extra steel | 38 lb | $5.87 a pound |
| Extra hopper | 5 lb | $44.60 an hour |
| Extra warranty | 1 year | $222.99 a year |
| Extra cooking area | None | You lose 5 sq in |
Read the bottom row last. You pay 25.4% more and receive slightly less grate.
The steel is the honest part. Grilla weighs 170 pounds against 132, and 38 pounds of extra metal at $5.87 a pound is fair pricing rather than a markup, because mass is what holds heat when the lid opens in January.
The hopper is thinner value. Five extra pounds of pellets is roughly five extra hours at low and slow, given both burn near a pound an hour, and $44.60 an hour is a strange way to buy time.
The warranty is the one that stings. One additional year of coverage for $222.99, on a grill you would rather not need covered at all.

Then the Test Results Arrive
Here is where the comparison turns, and it turns hard.
- AmazingRibs measured 15 to 20F variation across the Grilla's corners
- Smoked BBQ Source measured within 4F across the Z Grills chamber
- Z Grills quotes its PID controller as holding within 5F
- Testers also found the Grilla's 180F setting running near 260F until adjusted
Take those at face value and the cheaper grill is three to five times tighter on temperature. Not a rounding difference. On a fourteen hour brisket that is the gap between a controller you trust overnight and one you climb out of bed to check at two in the morning.
Worth being precise about what those figures describe, though. Corner to corner variation across a chamber is not the same measurement as swing over time at one probe, and neither reviewer ran the other's grill under the other's conditions, so the gap reads as a strong signal rather than a laboratory verdict.
None of which makes the Grilla a bad cooker. AmazingRibs gave it four stars and a Best Value gold medal, and owners cook happily on it for years. It does mean the premium is not buying precision, and precision is what most people assume a premium buys.
Where Grilla Earns Some of It Back
Three places, and they are real.
Build first. Welded, powder coated and caulked seams, with stainless firepot, diffuser, drip tray and grates on the upper models, and those 38 extra pounds sitting behind it all.
Then the controller behaviour. Grilla's Alpha Connect runs two modes, one tuned for steady temperatures and one that runs hotter over the firepot and throws more smoke, which is a genuine feature rather than a spec sheet line.
Then ownership. Grilla is now part of American Outdoor Brands with assembly consolidated into Columbia, Missouri, while Z Grills built its business as an original equipment manufacturer supplying the category. Neither fact tells you how a grill cooks, and one of them tells you who answers the phone in year three.
The Clearance Price Changes the Answer
This part matters more than anything above, and it is easy to miss.
Grilla's own site has been running the older Silverbac at $699 against a $1,299 list while the current 2.0 sits at $1,099.99 on the category pages, which is two very different numbers attached to what looks at a glance like one product. Same name. Same silhouette.
At $699 the maths inverts completely. That is $178 below the Z Grills 700D4E and works out at $1.01 per square inch, which is the best value in this whole article by a wide margin.
So establish which generation you are being offered before anything else. The 2.0 brought a squared off body, the bigger 33 pound hopper and the updated controller, and if a listing is quiet about which one it is then assume it is the outgoing model.

Cost Per Square Inch, Honestly
- Grilla Silverbac 2.0: $2.17 per square inch of main grate
- Z Grills: $1.74 per square inch of main grate
- Silverbac on clearance: $1.01 per square inch of total area
Measured on main grate, which is where food actually cooks, the Z Grills 700D4E comes in 24.7% cheaper per square inch than the current Grilla.
Measured on the clearance model, Grilla wins outright. Both statements are true at the same time, which is exactly why a single verdict on this pairing is useless.
So Which One
| Your situation | Buy |
| Tightest temperature control | Z Grills |
| Best price per square inch | Z Grills |
| Heaviest build | Grilla |
| Longest warranty | Grilla |
| Cold smoking below 180F | Z Grills |
| Silverbac 1.0 on clearance | Grilla, easily |
Four situations to Z Grills, two to Grilla at list, and the clearance row overrides everything above it.
At full price, buy the Z Grills. It is bigger by a hair, cheaper by $223, holds temperature far tighter in independent testing, and starts 20F lower for cold smoking.
At clearance price, buy the Grilla. Heavier build, longer warranty, and $178 less than the alternative is not a close call, provided you are content with the previous generation.
Anyone weighing Grilla vs Z Grills should check today's price before anything else, because this comparison flips on discount rather than on hardware, and the hardware is nearly identical anyway.
FAQs
Which is bigger?
Z Grills, barely. 697 square inches against 692, with main grates of 504 and 507.
Which holds temperature better?
Z Grills in published testing, measured within 4F against 15 to 20F for the Grilla.
Which has the longer warranty?
Grilla, at four years against three.
Which is heavier?
Grilla, at 170 lb against 132. That is 38 pounds of extra steel.
Can either one sear?
Not really. Both stop around 500F, which handles smoking and roasting but falls short of a proper crust.
Is the cheaper Grilla the same grill?
No. The $699 listing is the earlier Silverbac, before the squared body, 33 lb hopper and updated controller.
Prices, specifications and warranty terms were accurate at the time of writing and change often, particularly on clearance listings. Temperature figures are drawn from published independent testing rather than our own measurements. Confirm which generation you are buying before ordering.
Do you agree with our review?
Comments (0)
All comments are reviewed and approved by an admin before appearing publicly.
No comments yet - be the first to share your thoughts.
Ask a Question
Got a question about this review or the brand? Ask below - our team answers what we can, and it'll appear here for other readers too.



