Grilla Grills vs Monument Grills: You Are Choosing a Fuel
Openly: affiliate links sit here and we earn on both brands. The cheaper one wins most of the rows below, and we have left it that way rather than manufacturing a tie.
Most comparisons pit two versions of the same thing against each other. This one does not.
Grilla burns wood pellets. Monument burns propane. So Grilla Grills vs Monument Grills is really a question about what you cook on a Wednesday evening, and the price gap only makes sense once you have answered that.
Two Different Machines
| Grilla Silverbac 2.0 | Monument Mesa 415BZ | |
| Fuel | Wood pellets | Liquid propane |
| Price | $1,099.99 | $499 |
| Main grate | 507 sq in | 450 sq in |
| Second rack | 185 sq in | 180 sq in |
| Top temperature | 500F | 630F at the sear zone |
| Output | Not rated in BTU | 62,000 BTU |
| Fuel load | 33 lb hopper | 20 lb tank |
| Warranty | 4 years | Published as 10 years |
The row that matters most is the temperature one. One of these grills reaches 630F and the other stops at 500F.
Cooking areas are close enough to ignore, at six hundred ninety two square inches against six hundred thirty with main grates of 507 and 450, which means nobody is buying either of these machines for the extra room.
The price gap is the opposite of close. At $1,099.99 against $499, the Grilla costs $600.99 more, which is 2.2 times the money for a machine that cannot get as hot.
The 130 Degrees That Decide It
Here is the most useful fact in this comparison. Neither brand puts it on the front page.
Monument's Mesa 415BZ carries a dedicated sear zone measured at 630F. The Grilla Silverbac tops out at 500F, which leaves a 130 degree gap, or 26% more heat on the cheaper machine, and that is the difference between a crust and a grey band on the outside of a steak.
- Pellet grills at 500F roast rather than sear
- A proper steak crust wants 600F and upward
- Independent testers rated the Grilla's searing as its weakest area
- Monument reaches 500F in under five minutes from cold
That last bullet is the second half of the argument. A gas grill lights instantly and is ready before you have finished seasoning the meat, while a pellet grill has to ignite, purge and climb, which is closer to ten or fifteen minutes.
For anyone whose grilling is mostly burgers, chops and chicken thighs after work, that combination of speed and heat is not a small convenience. It is the entire product.
None of which makes 500F useless. Roasting a chicken, cooking ribs, holding a pork shoulder at 225F for twelve hours, all of that sits comfortably inside a pellet grill's range and none of it wants 630 degrees anywhere near it.

What Pellets Do That Gas Cannot
Now the other direction, because propane has one hard limit and it is a big one.
A gas grill makes no smoke. You can add a smoker box and get a hint of it, and it will never be a fourteen hour brisket that tastes of hickory, because the fuel itself is not wood.
| Per full fuel load | Grilla | Monument |
| Fuel | 33 lb of pellets | 430,000 BTU tank |
| Burn rate | About 1 lb an hour | 50,000 BTU an hour |
| Runtime | Roughly 33 hours | 8.6 hours |
| At what setting | 250F smoking | All burners wide open |
Read the runtime row carefully. The pellet grill runs about 3.8 times longer per fill, though the two are being measured at very different settings.
A 20 pound propane tank holds roughly 430,000 BTU, so a 50,000 BTU main chamber empties it in about 8.6 hours running flat out, and dialling it down for indirect cooking stretches the same tank well past twenty hours of real use.
The Grilla's 33 pound hopper burns near a pound an hour at smoking temperatures, which is roughly 33 hours of unattended runtime. Nobody cooks for 33 hours. That is the point, because you load it once and never think about fuel again during an overnight cook.
There is a cost to that, and it is worth saying out loud. A pellet grill needs mains power, a clean firepot and a controller that keeps working, while a propane grill has a knob, an igniter and almost nothing to go wrong in year five. More capability. More to maintain.

Cost Per Square Inch
- Monument Mesa 415BZ: $1.11 per square inch of main grate
- Grilla Silverbac 2.0: $2.17 per square inch of main grate
- Grilla on clearance at $699: $1.38 per square inch
Measured on main grate, the Grilla costs 95.7% more per square inch than the Monument. Almost double, for less top end heat and a slower start.
Grilla's own site has been running the previous generation Silverbac at $699 against a $1,299 list, which brings it to $1.38 and narrows the gap considerably. Still $200 above the Monument, and still worth knowing which generation a listing means.
None of that makes the Monument Mesa 415BZ the better cooker. It makes it the cheaper square inch, and those are different claims.
The Warranty Line Worth Checking
Grilla publishes four years on the Silverbac 2.0. Clean, simple, easy to compare.
Monument is where it gets murky. One published review lists a 10 year limited warranty on the Mesa 415BZ while another describes coverage as one to eight years depending on the component, and those are very different promises hiding under similar wording.
Component based warranties are normal on gas grills, since burners, grates and cabinets all wear at different rates, so read the actual schedule rather than the headline number, because burners are the part that fails and the burner term is the only one that counts.
So Which One
| What you cook | Buy |
| Steaks and burgers on weeknights | Monument |
| Brisket, ribs, pork shoulder | Grilla |
| Anything needing a hard sear | Monument |
| Overnight cooks unattended | Grilla |
| Most cooking area per dollar | Monument |
| Actual wood smoke | Grilla, no contest |
Four rows to Monument, three to Grilla, and not one of them is really about brand quality.
Buy the Monument if you grill more than you smoke, you want heat in five minutes, and you would rather spend $499 than $1,100, especially given it arrives with a side burner, a rotisserie kit and a cast iron griddle plate thrown in at that price.
Buy the Grilla if smoke is the reason you are shopping at all, because nothing propane does replaces a hopper full of hardwood, and 33 hours of unattended runtime is an entire category of cooking that a gas grill cannot enter at any price.
Anyone weighing Grilla Grills vs Monument Grills on specification alone will end up with the wrong grill, because the specs describe two different jobs. Decide what you cook first, and the price stops being the argument.
FAQs
Which gets hotter?
Monument, by a wide margin. Its sear zone reaches 630F against 500F for the Grilla.
Which is cheaper?
Monument, at $499 against $1,099.99. That is $1.11 per square inch against $2.17.
Can the Monument smoke?
Not really. It is a propane grill, so any smoke has to come from an added box rather than the fuel.
How long does each run on one fuel load?
About 8.6 hours flat out for a 20 lb propane tank, and roughly 33 hours for a 33 lb pellet hopper at smoking temperatures.
Which has the better warranty?
Grilla publishes a straightforward four years. Monument's coverage is quoted differently across sources, so check the component schedule.
Is the cheaper Grilla the same grill?
No. The $699 listing is the earlier Silverbac, before the larger hopper and the updated controller.
Prices, specifications and warranty terms were accurate at the time of writing and change often, particularly on clearance listings. Runtime figures are calculated from published fuel capacities and burn rates rather than measured by us, and real world results vary with weather and setting. Confirm current terms before ordering.
Do you agree with our review?
Comments (0)
All comments are reviewed and approved by an admin before appearing publicly.
No comments yet - be the first to share your thoughts.
Ask a Question
Got a question about this review or the brand? Ask below - our team answers what we can, and it'll appear here for other readers too.



